Questions Details 
Category: Physiologic Trait
Question Name: Attractiveness
Question: How attractive are you?
Type:ABCD Answers:Very Attractive;Attractive;Average;Un-Attractive;Very Un-Attractive
Do not take into account things like weight, hair styles, etc. This question is asking if over-all you are good looking or not.

Answers: (48 answers total)
29.2% of responses ( 14/48 ) were: "Attractive"
60.4% of responses ( 29/48 ) were: "Average"
8.3% of responses ( 4/48 ) were: "Very Attractive"
2.1% of responses ( 1/48 ) were: "Very Un-Attractive"


Tracked Possible Correlations: suggest a NEW correlation to track
  Correlation #648: ↔ 324: Children, Current # of Born Children
  Correlation #649: ↔ 387: Popularity - Adult
  Correlation #650: ↔ 386: Popularity - High School
  Correlation #651: ↔ 385: Popularity - Grade School
  Correlation #652: ↔ 195: Times Sick per Year - Attractiveness has been said by biologists to be used as an indicator of overall health & fitness.
  Correlation #654: ↔ 345: # Sexual Partners
  Correlation #655: ↔ 388: Salary
  Correlation #656: ↔ 6: IQ - Attractiveness and IQ should both be measures of biological fitness and should correlate directly.
  Correlation #889: ↔ 493: Children with Birth Defects, Non-genetic
  Correlation #988: ↔ 196: Breast Fed
  Correlation #989: ↔ 197: Breast Fed Year
  Correlation #1044: ↔ 364: Cavities - Attractive people get less cavities.
  Correlation #1115: ↔ 232: Moles
  Correlation #1197: ↔ 552: Vaccine - Any as Child - Attractiveness is linked to health so vaccinated children should end up being more attractive.



Correlation of 461: Attractiveness Vs. 324: Children, Current # of Born Children

49 Responses:
 Children, Current # of Born Children →
 
Attractiveness ↓ 		012346
Very Attractive2.0%    0.0%0.0%2.0%    2.0%    2.0%    0.0%
Attractive6.1%    0.0%10.2%    10.2%    2.0%    0.0%0.0%
Average22.4%    0.0%8.2%    22.4%    6.1%    0.0%0.0%
Un-Attractive0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%
Very Un-Attractive2.0%    0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%



Correlation of 461: Attractiveness Vs. 387: Popularity - Adult

48 Responses:
 Popularity - Adult →
 
Attractiveness ↓ 		MUCH-MOREMOREAVGLESSMUCH-LESS
Very Attractive2.1%    2.1%    0.0%2.1%    2.1%    
Attractive0.0%10.4%    14.6%    4.2%    0.0%
Average2.1%    4.2%    37.5%    14.6%    0.0%
Un-Attractive0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%
Very Un-Attractive0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%2.1%    



Correlation of 461: Attractiveness Vs. 386: Popularity - High School

49 Responses:
 Popularity - High School →
 
Attractiveness ↓ 		MUCH-MOREMOREAVGLESSMUCH-LESS
Very Attractive2.0%    4.1%    0.0%0.0%2.0%    
Attractive2.0%    6.1%    10.2%    10.2%    0.0%
Average2.0%    4.1%    30.6%    14.3%    8.2%    
Un-Attractive0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%
Very Un-Attractive0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%2.0%    



Correlation of 461: Attractiveness Vs. 385: Popularity - Grade School

49 Responses:
 Popularity - Grade School →
 
Attractiveness ↓ 		MUCH-MOREMOREAVGLESSMUCH-LESS
Very Attractive4.1%    0.0%2.0%    0.0%2.0%    
Attractive0.0%6.1%    12.2%    6.1%    4.1%    
Average0.0%4.1%    28.6%    18.4%    8.2%    
Un-Attractive0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%
Very Un-Attractive0.0%0.0%0.0%2.0%    0.0%



Correlation of 461: Attractiveness Vs. 195: Times Sick per Year
Attractiveness has been said by biologists to be used as an indicator of overall health & fitness.

49 Responses:
 Times Sick per Year →
 
Attractiveness ↓ 		0123456-1011-2021+
Very Attractive0.0%4.1%    2.0%    0.0%2.0%    0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%
Attractive2.0%    8.2%    10.2%    2.0%    4.1%    0.0%2.0%    0.0%0.0%
Average4.1%    10.2%    20.4%    10.2%    2.0%    6.1%    4.1%    2.0%    0.0%
Un-Attractive0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%
Very Un-Attractive0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%2.0%    



Correlation of 461: Attractiveness Vs. 345: # Sexual Partners

48 Responses:
 # Sexual Partners →
 
Attractiveness ↓ 		012345678910111213141520232530375070100120
Very Attractive0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%4.2%    0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%2.1%    0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%2.1%    
Attractive0.0%0.0%4.2%    2.1%    0.0%2.1%    2.1%    0.0%2.1%    2.1%    2.1%    0.0%0.0%0.0%2.1%    4.2%    0.0%0.0%4.2%    0.0%0.0%2.1%    0.0%0.0%0.0%
Average4.2%    4.2%    0.0%6.2%    8.3%    4.2%    2.1%    2.1%    0.0%0.0%8.3%    0.0%2.1%    2.1%    0.0%4.2%    2.1%    2.1%    2.1%    2.1%    0.0%0.0%0.0%2.1%    0.0%
Un-Attractive0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%
Very Un-Attractive0.0%0.0%0.0%2.1%    0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%



Correlation of 461: Attractiveness Vs. 388: Salary

49 Responses:
 Salary →
 
Attractiveness ↓ 		None, student or minorNone, house wife/husbandNone, unemployedMinimum Wage Part TimeMinimum Wage Full TimeLower Middle Class PayUpper Middle Class PayExecutive PayCelebrity Pay
Very Attractive0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%4.1%    2.0%    0.0%0.0%
Attractive0.0%10.2%    2.0%    0.0%0.0%10.2%    6.1%    0.0%0.0%
Average2.0%    4.1%    8.2%    0.0%0.0%26.5%    18.4%    0.0%0.0%
Un-Attractive0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%
Very Un-Attractive0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%2.0%    0.0%0.0%



Correlation of 461: Attractiveness Vs. 6: IQ
Attractiveness and IQ should both be measures of biological fitness and should correlate directly.

34 Responses:
 IQ →
 
Attractiveness ↓ 		09095100103105109110115116117119120121122125126128129130132133134135136137138140142143144145150151152154155158160162169170176190200230
Very Attractive0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%2.9%    0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%2.9%    0.0%2.9%    0.0%0.0%2.9%    0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%
Attractive0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%2.9%    2.9%    2.9%    0.0%0.0%0.0%2.9%    0.0%0.0%2.9%    0.0%2.9%    0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%2.9%    0.0%0.0%0.0%2.9%    0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%
Average8.8%    0.0%2.9%    0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%2.9%    0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%2.9%    0.0%2.9%    5.9%    0.0%5.9%    0.0%2.9%    0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%2.9%    0.0%2.9%    0.0%2.9%    2.9%    0.0%2.9%    0.0%0.0%0.0%2.9%    2.9%    0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%2.9%    0.0%
Un-Attractive0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%
Very Un-Attractive0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%2.9%    0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%



Correlation of 461: Attractiveness Vs. 493: Children with Birth Defects, Non-genetic

28 Responses:
 Children with Birth Defects, Non-genetic →
 
Attractiveness ↓ 		0125
Very Attractive7.1%    0.0%0.0%
Attractive25.0%    0.0%0.0%
Average57.1%    3.6%    3.6%    
Un-Attractive0.0%0.0%0.0%
Very Un-Attractive3.6%    0.0%0.0%



Correlation of 461: Attractiveness Vs. 196: Breast Fed

48 Responses:
 Breast Fed →
 
Attractiveness ↓ 		YESNO
Very Attractive2.1%    6.2%    
Attractive12.5%    16.7%    
Average27.1%    29.2%    
Un-Attractive0.0%0.0%
Very Un-Attractive2.1%    0.0%



Correlation of 461: Attractiveness Vs. 197: Breast Fed Year

47 Responses:
 Breast Fed Year →
 
Attractiveness ↓ 		YESNO
Very Attractive0.0%8.5%    
Attractive8.5%    19.1%    
Average19.1%    40.4%    
Un-Attractive0.0%0.0%
Very Un-Attractive0.0%2.1%    



Correlation of 364: Cavities Vs. 461: Attractiveness
Attractive people get less cavities.

48 Responses:
 Attractiveness →
 
Cavities ↓ 		Very AttractiveAttractiveAverageUn-AttractiveVery Un-Attractive
00.0%2.1%    2.1%    0.0%0.0%
10.0%0.0%4.2%    0.0%0.0%
20.0%4.2%    4.2%    0.0%0.0%
30.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%
42.1%    2.1%    0.0%0.0%0.0%
52.1%    2.1%    4.2%    0.0%0.0%
60.0%2.1%    2.1%    0.0%0.0%
70.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%
80.0%0.0%6.2%    0.0%0.0%
90.0%0.0%2.1%    0.0%0.0%
104.2%    4.2%    10.4%    0.0%0.0%
110.0%2.1%    0.0%0.0%0.0%
120.0%2.1%    4.2%    0.0%0.0%
130.0%0.0%2.1%    0.0%0.0%
140.0%0.0%2.1%    0.0%0.0%
150.0%2.1%    2.1%    0.0%2.1%    
160.0%0.0%4.2%    0.0%0.0%
180.0%2.1%    0.0%0.0%0.0%
200.0%0.0%4.2%    0.0%0.0%
220.0%2.1%    0.0%0.0%0.0%
240.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%
250.0%0.0%2.1%    0.0%0.0%
260.0%0.0%2.1%    0.0%0.0%
320.0%2.1%    2.1%    0.0%0.0%
6310.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%



Correlation of 232: Moles Vs. 461: Attractiveness

48 Responses:
 Attractiveness →
 
Moles ↓ 		Very AttractiveAttractiveAverageUn-AttractiveVery Un-Attractive
00.0%6.2%    8.3%    0.0%0.0%
0.0%4.2%    0.0%0.0%0.0%
10.0%4.2%    4.2%    0.0%0.0%
22.1%    2.1%    6.2%    0.0%2.1%    
32.1%    0.0%6.2%    0.0%0.0%
40.0%2.1%    4.2%    0.0%0.0%
50.0%2.1%    4.2%    0.0%0.0%
62.1%    0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%
70.0%0.0%2.1%    0.0%0.0%
80.0%2.1%    0.0%0.0%0.0%
90.0%2.1%    0.0%0.0%0.0%
102.1%    2.1%    4.2%    0.0%0.0%
110.0%0.0%2.1%    0.0%0.0%
120.0%0.0%2.1%    0.0%0.0%
130.0%2.1%    0.0%0.0%0.0%
150.0%0.0%2.1%    0.0%0.0%
200.0%0.0%2.1%    0.0%0.0%
300.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%
350.0%0.0%2.1%    0.0%0.0%
400.0%0.0%2.1%    0.0%0.0%
500.0%0.0%2.1%    0.0%0.0%
700.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%
1000.0%0.0%4.2%    0.0%0.0%
5000.0%0.0%2.1%    0.0%0.0%
10000.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%



Correlation of 552: Vaccine - Any as Child Vs. 461: Attractiveness
Attractiveness is linked to health so vaccinated children should end up being more attractive.

17 Responses:
 Attractiveness →
 
Vaccine - Any as Child ↓ 		Very AttractiveAttractiveAverageUn-AttractiveVery Un-Attractive
YES5.9%    35.3%    52.9%    0.0%0.0%
NO0.0%0.0%5.9%    0.0%0.0%

Site by Louy (LouisMarquette.com)       Other Sites by: EventLister.com / CraftLister.com 4thWayInfo.com HypnosisForGrowth.com ShotByCupid.com