Questions Details 
Category: Physiologic Trait
Question Name: Finger Length Ratio 2D:4D
Question: What is the ratio of length of your 2nd finger (index or pointing finger) to your 4th finger (ring finger)?
Type:ABCD Answers:2D is much longer than 4D;2D is longer than 4D;2D is the same length as 4D;2D is shorther than 4D;2D is much shorther than 4D

More details on this question!: Click to Toggle Expand
Detailed Question Description:
For this question, select MUCH longer or shorter only if the difference in length is more than about three quarters of the length of your nail length on the 4th finger. E.g. if your shorter finger's tip only comes up to the bed of the nail on the longer finger, then it is MUCH longer.

A shorter index finder (the bigger the difference between the 2 lengths), the more prenatal exposure to androgens.

Possible & Known Correlations:
It has been suggested by some scientists that the ratio of two digits in particular, the 2nd (index finger) and 4th (ring finger) is affected by exposure to androgens such as testosterone while in the uterus and that this 2D:4D ratio can be used as a crude measure for prenatal androgen exposure.

The digit ratio is the ratio of the lengths of different digits, fingers or toes, typically as measured from the bottom crease where the finger joins the hand to the tip of the finger.

The 2D:4D ratio is sexually dimorphic: in men, the second digit tends to be shorter than the fourth, and in females the second tends to be the same size or slightly longer than the fourth. Some would prefer to say that this trait is 'sexually differentiated' rather than 'sexually dimorphic' in recognition of the fact that the effect size is fairly small (2D:4D distributions of the two sexes overlap to a great degree), especially as compared to other sexually dimorphic traits such as height.

Correlation between digit ratio and traits

Some authors suggest that digit ratio correlated to health, behavior, and even sexuality, in later life. What follows is a non-exhaustive list of some traits which have been either demonstrated or suggested to correlate with digit ratio.


Physiology and disease
Sperm counts (Manning et al 1998)
Heart disease (Manning & Bundred 2001)
Obesity & Metabolic syndrome (Fink, Manning, Neave 2005)

Psychological disorders
Autism (Manning et al 2001)
Depression (Bailey & Hurd, 2005b)
Schizophrenia (Arato et al 2004)

Physical and competitive ability
Skiing (Manning 2002b)
Soccer ability (Manning & Taylor 2001)
Sporting ability in females (Paul et al 2006)
Financial trading (Coates et al 2009)[1]

Cognition and personality
Assertiveness in women (Wilson 1983)
Spatial ability (van Anders & Hampson 2005)
Aggression (Benderlioglu & Nelson, 2004 , Bailey & Hurd 2005a)
Masculinity of Handwriting (Beech and Macintosh 2004)
Perceived 'dominance' and masculinity of man's face (Neave et al 2003; Burriss et al. 2006)
Personality (Austin et al 2002, Fink et al 2004, Luxen & Buunk 2005)
Exam scores: a higher ratio is correlated with higher exam scores among male university students (Romano et al 2006)
Musical ability (Sluming et al 2000)

Sexual orientation
Bem sex role score in women (Csatho et al 2003), erotic role preference in men (McIntyre 2003)
Lesbians vs. straight women, butch vs. femme lesbians (Brown et al 2002)  http://msu.edu/~breedsm/pdf/ButchFemme.pdf
Gay vs straight men and the very odd Europe vs. North American straight man effect (reviewed in McFadden et al 2005 [2]).
Difference in digit ratio between identical female twins discordant for sexual orientation (Hall & Love 2003)
Fraternal birth order effect on digit ratio (Williams et al 2000).   http://msu.edu/~breedsm/pdf/breedlove2000.pdf

Transsexualism
A recent study in Germany has found a correlation between digit ratio and male to female transsexualism. Male to female transsexuals were found to have a higher digit ratio than control males, but one that was comparable to control females. (Transmen showed ratio comparable to biological females.) (Schneider, Pickel & Stalla 2005)

Digit ratio and handedness, autism, other immune diseases

There is some evidence that testosterone facilitates the differentiation of the brain both prenatally and postnatally. There have been many extensions of this, such as the Geschwind-Galaburda Hypothesis, that immune diseases (Geschwind and Galaburda, 1985) and autism (Baron-Cohen et al., 2004) are related to prenatal testosterone, this also explaining why more men are left-handed, autistic, etc. than women. Prenatal exposure to testosterone is thought to promote the development of the right-hemisphere and increase the incidence of sinistrality. As such low 2D:4D was found to be associated with improved left-hand performance (Manning et al 2000, Fink et al 2004).


Digit ratio and development

There is some evidence that 2D:4D ratio may also be indicative for human development and growth. Ronalds et al (2002) showed that men who had an above average placental weight and a shorter neonatal crown-heel length had higher 2D:4D ratios in adult life. Moreover, studies about 2D:4D correlations with face shape suggest that testosterone exposure early in life may set some constraints for subsequent development. Prenatal sex steroid ratios (in terms of 2D:4D) and actual chromosomal sex dimorphism were found to operate differently on human faces, but affect male and female face shape by similar patterns (Fink et al 2005). However, exposure to very high levels of testosterone and/or estrogen in the womb may have also negative effects. Fink et al (2004) found that men with low (indicating high testosterone) and women with high (indicating high estrogen) 2D:4D ratios express lower levels of facial symmetry .


Cancer
Oimitrios Tricopou1os, an epidemiologist at  Harvard University, proposed a decade ago that breast cancer may originate in utero (The Lancet, vol. 335, p 939). He suggested that high concentrations of estrogen may create a "fertile soil" for cancer to develop later in life, He also thought that variability in estrogen levels during pregnancy may help to explain why breast cancer rates are generally higher in women born to Caucasian mothers compared with those born to Oriental or younger mothers. Recently he and his colleague Karin Michels showed that high birth weight in girls-another sign of high prenatal estrogen levels-was associated with an increased risk of breast cancer.

Handedness
Children with low 2D:4D ratios suggestive of high exposure to testosterone in the womb-are more likely to be quicker with their left hands than the kids with higher ratios. This, he says, suggests that our degree of left-handedness and more generally the way the brain divides up tasks between left and right hemispheres - may be influenced by hormone levels in the womb.

Autism
Children with low 2D:4D ratios suggestive of high exposure to testosterone in the womb-are more likely to be quicker with their left hands than the kids with higher ratios. This, he says, suggests that our degree of left-handedness and more generally the way the brain divides up tasks between left and right hemispheres - may be influenced by hormone levels in the womb.
Manning has begun examining autism too. He teamed up with Simon Baron- Cohen and Svetlana Lutchmaya from the University of Cambridge, who have used samples of amniotic fluid to directly measure the levels of hormones that babies are exposed to in the womb. When the children reached their first birthday, the researchers measured their vocabularies and ability to make eye contact. Poor language skills and an unwillingness to make eye contact are early hallmarks of autism. They found that babies who'd been exposed to high levels of testosterone in the womb fared the worst.
"What we're hoping to look at is whether finger ratios can be used as a proxy for hormones," says Lutchmaya. Amniocentesis is a risky procedure that only a few mothers choose to undergo, she says. But by measuring finger lengths instead, researchers can assess a random sample of children for possible early signs of impaired language and social skill development. Currently, they are checking the fingers of children for whom they have amniotic samples. Meanwhile, Manning and Baron-Cohen have looked at the finger ratios of 49 children with firm diagnoses of autism, 23 with a mild form of the disorder called Asperger's syndrome, and their families. The researchers found that autistic children tended to have very low 2D:4 ratios. Interestingly, children with Asperger's syndrome had ratios that fell between those of autistics and unaffected children. "It fits exceptionally well with the theory," says Manning.

Musical Ability
Manning recruited 54 male musicians from a British symphony orchestra. He discovered that these men had significantly lower 2D:4D ratios than controls-they had a very "masculine" ratio. Even more striking, when he compared the top-ranked "first" musicians with their lower-ranked colleagues--a measure of their  relative ability-the former had significantly lower 2D:4D ratios. Could testosterone really predispose the brain to be more tuned in to music? Manning thinks so.


Aggression
The research, done at the University of Alberta and announced Wednesday, found a connection between the length of the male index finger relative to the ring finger and the tendency to be aggressive. No such connection was found in women.


Examination marks of male university students positively correlate with finger length ratios (2D:4D)


Maria Romano, Barbara Leoni and Nicola Saino; Università degli Studi di Milano; 13 October 2004 -
Intersexual and intrasexual variation in second to fourth digit length (2D:4D) in humans may result from differential exposure to fetal testosterone. 2D:4D predicts several physiological, psychological and performance traits in adulthood. These relationships may reflect the ‘pleiotropic’ effects of testosterone on development of digits and diverse organ systems, which are expressed in adulthood. We hypothesized that 2D:4D also predicts academic success of students. 2D:4D of right hand positively predicted examination marks of males from two three-year degree courses (TYDCs). Marks of females did not covary with 2D:4D. Males from the two TYDCs differed in 2D:4D. The present results thus add to the rapidly accumulating literature on 2D:4D showing correlations with phenotypic traits in humans. If testosterone affects 2D:4D and intellectual performance, our results suggest that testosterone levels are under stabilizing selection because of effects on performance traits documented in previous studies and antagonistic effects on intellectual performance (present study).


More Info:
http://www.human-nature.com/nibbs/02/manning.html
http://www.palmistry.org/fing.html


Length of index and ring fingers differentially influence sexual attractiveness of men's and women's hands  - Saino, N., Romano, M., Innocenti, P.      2006

Digit ratio (2D:4D) moderates the impact of an aggressive music video on aggression  - Millet, K., Dewitte, S.      2007

Index to ring finger length ratio and the risk of osteoarthritis - Zhang, W., Robertson, J., Doherty, S., Liu, J.J., Maciewicz, R.A., Muir, K.R., Doherty, M.      2008

2d:4d, sex steroid hormones and human psychological sex differences  - Vermeersch, H., T'Sjoen, G., Kaufman, J.M., Vincke, J.





Question Help:



Answers: (185 answers total)
21.6% of responses ( 40/185 ) were: "2D is longer than 4D"
4.3% of responses ( 8/185 ) were: "2D is much longer than 4D"
2.7% of responses ( 5/185 ) were: "2D is much shorther than 4D"
42.7% of responses ( 79/185 ) were: "2D is shorther than 4D"
28.1% of responses ( 52/185 ) were: "2D is the same length as 4D"
0.5% of responses ( 1/185 ) were: "TRUE"



Tracked Possible Correlations: suggest a NEW correlation to track
  Correlation #29: ↔ 175: Aggressive / Peace-seeker - Prenatal exposure to androgen affects 2D:4D finger ration and has been suggested to also increase adult aggression/violence/crime.
  Correlation #30: ↔ 36: Arrests
  Correlation #31: ↔ 37: Crimes
  Correlation #32: ↔ 154: Fights
  Correlation #35: ↔ 172: Musical Instrument
  Correlation #53: ↔ 15: Sexual Preference
  Correlation #68: ↔ 351: Penis Length
  Correlation #69: ↔ 352: Penis Girth
  Correlation #70: ↔ 116: Areola Size
  Correlation #71: ↔ 117: Nipple Size
  Correlation #72: ↔ 118: Nipple Protrusion
  Correlation #126: ↔ 53: Teen Acne
  Correlation #127: ↔ 53: Teen Acne
  Correlation #134: ↔ 358: Breast Size
  Correlation #138: ↔ 359: Innate Sexuality
  Correlation #165: ↔ 2: Dominant Hand - Left handedness has been attributed to a stress on the fetus which high androgens levels could cause.
  Correlation #171: ↔ 122: Muscle Mass
  Correlation #175: ↔ 324: Children, Current # of Born Children
  Correlation #187: ↔ 263: Atherosclerosis
  Correlation #280: ↔ 54: Brow Ridges
  Correlation #316: ↔ 235: Toe Joint Point of 2nd and 3rd Toes
  Correlation #317: ↔ 96: Morton's Toe
  Correlation #334: ↔ 14: Head Hair Swirl Direction
  Correlation #383: ↔ 383: Trade - Artist
  Correlation #384: ↔ 384: Trade - Musician
  Correlation #432: ↔ 388: Salary
  Correlation #514: ↔ 412: Testicular Alignment
  Correlation #636: ↔ 173: Leader / Follower
  Correlation #679: ↔ 456: Prostate Gland - Enlarged - Finger ratio depends on sex hormones, and artificial exposure of femal sex hormones cam cause prostate cancer, so does prenatal androgen exposure affect later estrogen's tendancy to cause cancer in men?
  Correlation #1047: ↔ 195: Times Sick per Year
  Correlation #1081: ↔ 535: Birth Mass (Weight)
  Correlation #1082: ↔ 534: Gestational Period
  Correlation #1083: ↔ 533: Gestational Period, Difference




Correlation of 21: Finger Length Ratio 2D:4D Vs. 175: Aggressive / Peace-seeker
Prenatal exposure to androgen affects 2D:4D finger ration and has been suggested to also increase adult aggression/violence/crime.

148 Responses:
 Aggressive / Peace-seeker
 
Finger Length Ratio 2D:4D
AggressivePeace-seeker
2D is much longer than 4D0.0%4.1%    
2D is longer than 4D2.7%    16.9%    
2D is the same length as 4D4.7%    23.0%    
2D is shorther than 4D9.5%    33.1%    
2D is much shorther than 4D0.0%2.7%    


31 Responses from Males:
Aggressive / Peace-seeker
x Finger Length Ratio 2D:4D
AggressivePeace-seeker
2D is much longer than 4D0%0%
2D is longer than 4D0%12%    
2D is the same length as 4D6%    6%    
2D is shorther than 4D19%    51%    
2D is much shorther than 4D0%0%


117 Responses from Females:
Aggressive / Peace-seeker
x Finger Length Ratio 2D:4D
AggressivePeace-seeker
2D is much longer than 4D0%5%    
2D is longer than 4D3%    17%    
2D is the same length as 4D4%    27%    
2D is shorther than 4D6%    28%    
2D is much shorther than 4D0%3%    




Correlation of 21: Finger Length Ratio 2D:4D Vs. 36: Arrests

155 Responses:
 Arrests
 
Finger Length Ratio 2D:4D
YESNO
2D is much longer than 4D0.6%    2.6%    
2D is longer than 4D3.9%    18.1%    
2D is the same length as 4D3.9%    23.9%    
2D is shorther than 4D11.0%    30.3%    
2D is much shorther than 4D0.6%    1.9%    


31 Responses from Males:
Arrests
x Finger Length Ratio 2D:4D
YESNO
2D is much longer than 4D0%0%
2D is longer than 4D3%    9%    
2D is the same length as 4D3%    9%    
2D is shorther than 4D25%    45%    
2D is much shorther than 4D0%0%


124 Responses from Females:
Arrests
x Finger Length Ratio 2D:4D
YESNO
2D is much longer than 4D0%3%    
2D is longer than 4D4%    20%    
2D is the same length as 4D4%    27%    
2D is shorther than 4D7%    26%    
2D is much shorther than 4D0%2%    




Correlation of 21: Finger Length Ratio 2D:4D Vs. 37: Crimes

153 Responses:
 Crimes
 
Finger Length Ratio 2D:4D
YESNO
2D is much longer than 4D0.0%3.3%    
2D is longer than 4D2.6%    18.3%    
2D is the same length as 4D1.3%    26.8%    
2D is shorther than 4D7.2%    35.3%    
2D is much shorther than 4D0.0%2.6%    


31 Responses from Males:
Crimes
x Finger Length Ratio 2D:4D
YESNO
2D is much longer than 4D0%0%
2D is longer than 4D3%    9%    
2D is the same length as 4D3%    9%    
2D is shorther than 4D16%    54%    
2D is much shorther than 4D0%0%


122 Responses from Females:
Crimes
x Finger Length Ratio 2D:4D
YESNO
2D is much longer than 4D0%4%    
2D is longer than 4D2%    20%    
2D is the same length as 4D0%31%    
2D is shorther than 4D4%    30%    
2D is much shorther than 4D0%3%    




Correlation of 21: Finger Length Ratio 2D:4D Vs. 154: Fights

142 Responses:
 Fights
 
Finger Length Ratio 2D:4D
0123456101520401002301000
2D is much longer than 4D2.1%    0.0%0.7%    0.0%0.7%    0.0%0.7%    0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%
2D is longer than 4D12.7%    0.0%0.7%    2.1%    1.4%    0.7%    0.0%0.0%0.7%    0.0%0.0%0.7%    0.7%    0.7%    0.0%
2D is the same length as 4D19.0%    0.0%1.4%    2.8%    1.4%    0.0%2.1%    0.7%    0.7%    0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.7%    
2D is shorther than 4D27.5%    0.0%2.1%    4.9%    2.1%    0.0%1.4%    0.7%    0.7%    0.7%    0.7%    0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%
2D is much shorther than 4D2.8%    0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%


31 Responses from Males:
Fights
x Finger Length Ratio 2D:4D
0123456101520401002301000
2D is much longer than 4D0%0%0%0%0%0%0%0%0%0%0%0%0%0%0%
2D is longer than 4D12%    0%0%0%0%0%0%0%0%0%0%0%0%0%0%
2D is the same length as 4D3%    0%3%    3%    0%0%0%0%0%0%0%0%0%0%3%    
2D is shorther than 4D41%    0%0%12%    6%    0%3%    3%    3%    0%0%0%0%0%0%
2D is much shorther than 4D0%0%0%0%0%0%0%0%0%0%0%0%0%0%0%


111 Responses from Females:
Fights
x Finger Length Ratio 2D:4D
0123456101520401002301000
2D is much longer than 4D2%    0%0%0%0%0%0%0%0%0%0%0%0%0%0%
2D is longer than 4D12%    0%0%2%    1%    0%0%0%0%0%0%0%0%0%0%
2D is the same length as 4D23%    0%0%2%    1%    0%2%    0%0%0%0%0%0%0%0%
2D is shorther than 4D23%    0%2%    2%    0%0%0%0%0%0%0%0%0%0%0%
2D is much shorther than 4D3%    0%0%0%0%0%0%0%0%0%0%0%0%0%0%




Correlation of 172: Musical Instrument Vs. 21: Finger Length Ratio 2D:4D

99 Responses:
 Finger Length Ratio 2D:4D
 
Musical Instrument
2D is much longer than 4D2D is longer than 4D2D is the same length as 4D2D is shorther than 4D2D is much shorther than 4D
YES2.0%    10.1%    7.1%    21.2%    2.0%    
NO2.0%    9.1%    19.2%    26.3%    1.0%    




Correlation of 15: Sexual Preference Vs. 21: Finger Length Ratio 2D:4D

184 Responses:
 Finger Length Ratio 2D:4D
 
Sexual Preference
2D is much longer than 4D2D is longer than 4D2D is the same length as 4D2D is shorther than 4D2D is much shorther than 4D
Hererosexual3.8%    19.0%    23.9%    40.8%    1.6%    
Homosexual0.0%0.5%    0.0%1.6%    0.5%    
Bi-Sexual0.5%    1.6%    1.6%    0.5%    0.5%    


34 Responses from Males:
Finger Length Ratio 2D:4D
x Sexual Preference
2D is much longer than 4D2D is longer than 4D2D is the same length as 4D2D is shorther than 4D2D is much shorther than 4D
Hererosexual0%8%    14%    67%    0%
Homosexual0%2%    0%2%    0%
Bi-Sexual0%2%    0%0%0%


149 Responses from Females:
Finger Length Ratio 2D:4D
x Sexual Preference
2D is much longer than 4D2D is longer than 4D2D is the same length as 4D2D is shorther than 4D2D is much shorther than 4D
Hererosexual4%    21%    26%    34%    2%    
Homosexual0%0%0%1%    0%
Bi-Sexual0%1%    2%    0%0%




Correlation of 351: Penis Length Vs. 21: Finger Length Ratio 2D:4D

120 Responses:
 Finger Length Ratio 2D:4D
 
Penis Length
2D is much longer than 4D2D is longer than 4D2D is the same length as 4D2D is shorther than 4D2D is much shorther than 4D
Very Small0.0%0.0%1.7%    0.8%    0.0%
Small0.0%0.0%0.0%1.7%    0.0%
Average0.0%3.3%    1.7%    7.5%    0.0%
Large0.0%0.8%    0.8%    2.5%    0.0%
Very Large0.0%0.0%0.8%    4.2%    0.0%




Correlation of 352: Penis Girth Vs. 21: Finger Length Ratio 2D:4D

120 Responses:
 Finger Length Ratio 2D:4D
 
Penis Girth
2D is much longer than 4D2D is longer than 4D2D is the same length as 4D2D is shorther than 4D2D is much shorther than 4D
Very Small0.0%0.0%0.8%    0.0%0.0%
Small0.0%0.0%0.0%1.7%    0.0%
Average0.0%3.3%    3.3%    10.0%    0.0%
Large0.0%0.8%    0.0%3.3%    0.0%
Very Large0.0%0.0%0.0%1.7%    0.0%




Correlation of 116: Areola Size Vs. 21: Finger Length Ratio 2D:4D

106 Responses:
 Finger Length Ratio 2D:4D
 
Areola Size
2D is much longer than 4D2D is longer than 4D2D is the same length as 4D2D is shorther than 4D2D is much shorther than 4D
Very Large0.0%0.9%    1.9%    2.8%    0.9%    
Large0.0%5.7%    3.8%    6.6%    0.9%    
Average1.9%    4.7%    15.1%    26.4%    0.9%    
Small1.9%    2.8%    5.7%    6.6%    0.0%
Very Small0.0%0.9%    0.0%0.9%    0.0%




Correlation of 117: Nipple Size Vs. 21: Finger Length Ratio 2D:4D

105 Responses:
 Finger Length Ratio 2D:4D
 
Nipple Size
2D is much longer than 4D2D is longer than 4D2D is the same length as 4D2D is shorther than 4D2D is much shorther than 4D
Very Small0.0%1.0%    1.0%    0.0%0.0%
Small1.0%    1.9%    4.8%    13.3%    1.0%    
Average2.9%    10.5%    14.3%    23.8%    1.9%    
Large0.0%3.8%    1.9%    6.7%    0.0%
Very Large0.0%0.0%3.8%    1.0%    0.0%




Correlation of 118: Nipple Protrusion Vs. 21: Finger Length Ratio 2D:4D

106 Responses:
 Finger Length Ratio 2D:4D
 
Nipple Protrusion
2D is much longer than 4D2D is longer than 4D2D is the same length as 4D2D is shorther than 4D2D is much shorther than 4D
Far0.9%    4.7%    4.7%    3.8%    0.0%
Average1.9%    9.4%    16.0%    31.1%    1.9%    
Short0.9%    2.8%    5.7%    9.4%    0.9%    




Correlation of 53: Teen Acne Vs. 21: Finger Length Ratio 2D:4D

138 Responses:
 Finger Length Ratio 2D:4D
 
Teen Acne
2D is much longer than 4D2D is longer than 4D2D is the same length as 4D2D is shorther than 4D2D is much shorther than 4D
YES0.0%7.2%    7.2%    17.4%    1.4%    
NO4.3%    12.3%    21.0%    28.3%    0.7%    




Correlation of 21: Finger Length Ratio 2D:4D Vs. 53: Teen Acne

142 Responses:
 Teen Acne
 
Finger Length Ratio 2D:4D
YESNO
2D is much longer than 4D0.0%4.2%    
2D is longer than 4D7.0%    12.0%    
2D is the same length as 4D7.0%    20.4%    
2D is shorther than 4D16.9%    27.5%    
2D is much shorther than 4D1.4%    0.7%    




Correlation of 358: Breast Size Vs. 21: Finger Length Ratio 2D:4D

77 Responses:
 Finger Length Ratio 2D:4D
 
Breast Size
2D is much longer than 4D2D is longer than 4D2D is the same length as 4D2D is shorther than 4D2D is much shorther than 4D
Very Small1.3%    0.0%2.6%    0.0%1.3%    
Small1.3%    3.9%    5.2%    3.9%    1.3%    
Average1.3%    3.9%    10.4%    26.0%    0.0%
Large1.3%    1.3%    2.6%    13.0%    0.0%
Very Large0.0%2.6%    3.9%    6.5%    0.0%




Correlation of 359: Innate Sexuality Vs. 21: Finger Length Ratio 2D:4D

77 Responses:
 Finger Length Ratio 2D:4D
 
Innate Sexuality
2D is much longer than 4D2D is longer than 4D2D is the same length as 4D2D is shorther than 4D2D is much shorther than 4D
Heterosexual5.2%    13.0%    26.0%    49.4%    2.6%    
Homosexual0.0%1.3%    0.0%1.3%    0.0%
Bi-Sexual0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%




Correlation of 2: Dominant Hand Vs. 21: Finger Length Ratio 2D:4D
Left handedness has been attributed to a stress on the fetus which high androgens levels could cause.

185 Responses:
 Finger Length Ratio 2D:4D
 
Dominant Hand
2D is much longer than 4D2D is longer than 4D2D is the same length as 4D2D is shorther than 4D2D is much shorther than 4D
Left0.5%    0.0%3.2%    0.5%    1.1%    
Right3.2%    19.5%    22.2%    40.0%    1.1%    
Ambidextrous0.5%    2.2%    2.7%    2.2%    0.5%    


34 Responses from Males:
Finger Length Ratio 2D:4D
x Dominant Hand
2D is much longer than 4D2D is longer than 4D2D is the same length as 4D2D is shorther than 4D2D is much shorther than 4D
Left0%0%0%0%0%
Right0%14%    11%    67%    0%
Ambidextrous0%0%2%    2%    0%


149 Responses from Females:
Finger Length Ratio 2D:4D
x Dominant Hand
2D is much longer than 4D2D is longer than 4D2D is the same length as 4D2D is shorther than 4D2D is much shorther than 4D
Left0%0%4%    0%1%    
Right4%    20%    24%    34%    1%    
Ambidextrous0%2%    2%    2%    0%




Correlation of 122: Muscle Mass Vs. 21: Finger Length Ratio 2D:4D

106 Responses:
 Finger Length Ratio 2D:4D
 
Muscle Mass
2D is much longer than 4D2D is longer than 4D2D is the same length as 4D2D is shorther than 4D2D is much shorther than 4D
Very Small0.0%0.9%    1.9%    2.8%    0.0%
Small0.0%6.6%    6.6%    8.5%    0.9%    
Average2.8%    8.5%    17.0%    22.6%    1.9%    
Large0.9%    0.9%    2.8%    11.3%    0.0%
Very Large0.0%0.9%    0.0%0.0%0.0%


26 Responses from Males:
Finger Length Ratio 2D:4D
x Muscle Mass
2D is much longer than 4D2D is longer than 4D2D is the same length as 4D2D is shorther than 4D2D is much shorther than 4D
Very Small0%0%0%0%0%
Small0%11%    0%7%    0%
Average0%3%    7%    34%    0%
Large0%0%3%    30%    0%
Very Large0%0%0%0%0%


80 Responses from Females:
Finger Length Ratio 2D:4D
x Muscle Mass
2D is much longer than 4D2D is longer than 4D2D is the same length as 4D2D is shorther than 4D2D is much shorther than 4D
Very Small0%1%    2%    3%    0%
Small0%5%    8%    8%    1%    
Average3%    10%    20%    18%    2%    
Large1%    1%    2%    5%    0%
Very Large0%1%    0%0%0%




Correlation of 324: Children, Current # of Born Children Vs. 21: Finger Length Ratio 2D:4D

132 Responses:
 Finger Length Ratio 2D:4D
 
Children, Current # of Born Children
2D is much longer than 4D2D is longer than 4D2D is the same length as 4D2D is shorther than 4D2D is much shorther than 4D
00.8%    8.3%    10.6%    12.1%    1.5%    
0.0%0.0%0.8%    0.0%0.0%
10.0%0.8%    5.3%    9.8%    1.5%    
22.3%    5.3%    12.1%    15.2%    0.0%
31.5%    2.3%    1.5%    4.5%    0.0%
40.0%1.5%    0.8%    0.8%    0.0%
60.0%0.0%0.0%0.8%    0.0%




Correlation of 263: Atherosclerosis Vs. 21: Finger Length Ratio 2D:4D

89 Responses:
 Finger Length Ratio 2D:4D
 
Atherosclerosis
2D is much longer than 4D2D is longer than 4D2D is the same length as 4D2D is shorther than 4D2D is much shorther than 4D
YES0.0%0.0%1.1%    4.5%    0.0%
NO3.4%    15.7%    23.6%    44.9%    3.4%    




Correlation of 54: Brow Ridges Vs. 21: Finger Length Ratio 2D:4D

137 Responses:
 Finger Length Ratio 2D:4D
 
Brow Ridges
2D is much longer than 4D2D is longer than 4D2D is the same length as 4D2D is shorther than 4D2D is much shorther than 4D
YES2.2%    8.8%    8.8%    19.7%    0.7%    
NO2.2%    8.8%    17.5%    21.9%    0.7%    




Correlation of 235: Toe Joint Point of 2nd and 3rd Toes Vs. 21: Finger Length Ratio 2D:4D

94 Responses:
 Finger Length Ratio 2D:4D
 
Toe Joint Point of 2nd and 3rd Toes
2D is much longer than 4D2D is longer than 4D2D is the same length as 4D2D is shorther than 4D2D is much shorther than 4D
Even with the ones on either side2.1%    8.5%    9.6%    22.3%    0.0%
Split is Above the one on either side.2.1%    5.3%    10.6%    19.1%    1.1%    




Correlation of 96: Morton's Toe Vs. 21: Finger Length Ratio 2D:4D

109 Responses:
 Finger Length Ratio 2D:4D
 
Morton's Toe
2D is much longer than 4D2D is longer than 4D2D is the same length as 4D2D is shorther than 4D2D is much shorther than 4D
YES0.9%    6.4%    12.8%    21.1%    1.8%    
NO3.7%    10.1%    15.6%    23.9%    0.9%    




Correlation of 14: Head Hair Swirl Direction Vs. 21: Finger Length Ratio 2D:4D

130 Responses:
 Finger Length Ratio 2D:4D
 
Head Hair Swirl Direction
2D is much longer than 4D2D is longer than 4D2D is the same length as 4D2D is shorther than 4D2D is much shorther than 4D
Clockwise1.5%    2.3%    5.4%    16.9%    0.8%    
Counter-Clockwise0.0%1.5%    3.8%    5.4%    0.0%
Indeterminate3.1%    8.5%    11.5%    17.7%    0.8%    




Correlation of 383: Trade - Artist Vs. 21: Finger Length Ratio 2D:4D

70 Responses:
 Finger Length Ratio 2D:4D
 
Trade - Artist
2D is much longer than 4D2D is longer than 4D2D is the same length as 4D2D is shorther than 4D2D is much shorther than 4D
YES1.4%    8.6%    11.4%    27.1%    0.0%
NO2.9%    4.3%    14.3%    28.6%    1.4%    


20 Responses from Males:
Finger Length Ratio 2D:4D
x Trade - Artist
2D is much longer than 4D2D is longer than 4D2D is the same length as 4D2D is shorther than 4D2D is much shorther than 4D
YES0%0%5%    30%    0%
NO0%10%    10%    45%    0%


50 Responses from Females:
Finger Length Ratio 2D:4D
x Trade - Artist
2D is much longer than 4D2D is longer than 4D2D is the same length as 4D2D is shorther than 4D2D is much shorther than 4D
YES2%    12%    14%    26%    0%
NO4%    2%    16%    22%    2%    




Correlation of 384: Trade - Musician Vs. 21: Finger Length Ratio 2D:4D

70 Responses:
 Finger Length Ratio 2D:4D
 
Trade - Musician
2D is much longer than 4D2D is longer than 4D2D is the same length as 4D2D is shorther than 4D2D is much shorther than 4D
YES0.0%0.0%0.0%2.9%    0.0%
NO4.3%    12.9%    25.7%    52.9%    1.4%    


20 Responses from Males:
Finger Length Ratio 2D:4D
x Trade - Musician
2D is much longer than 4D2D is longer than 4D2D is the same length as 4D2D is shorther than 4D2D is much shorther than 4D
YES0%0%0%10%    0%
NO0%10%    15%    65%    0%


50 Responses from Females:
Finger Length Ratio 2D:4D
x Trade - Musician
2D is much longer than 4D2D is longer than 4D2D is the same length as 4D2D is shorther than 4D2D is much shorther than 4D
YES0%0%0%0%0%
NO6%    14%    30%    48%    2%    




Correlation of 388: Salary Vs. 21: Finger Length Ratio 2D:4D

68 Responses:
 Finger Length Ratio 2D:4D
 
Salary
2D is much longer than 4D2D is longer than 4D2D is the same length as 4D2D is shorther than 4D2D is much shorther than 4D
None, student or minor0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%1.5%    
None, house wife/husband0.0%2.9%    2.9%    8.8%    0.0%
None, unemployed0.0%0.0%1.5%    7.4%    0.0%
Minimum Wage Part Time0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%
Minimum Wage Full Time0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%
Lower Middle Class Pay1.5%    5.9%    11.8%    22.1%    0.0%
Upper Middle Class Pay2.9%    2.9%    8.8%    16.2%    0.0%
Executive Pay0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%
Celebrity Pay0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%




Correlation of 412: Testicular Alignment Vs. 21: Finger Length Ratio 2D:4D

59 Responses:
 Finger Length Ratio 2D:4D
 
Testicular Alignment
2D is much longer than 4D2D is longer than 4D2D is the same length as 4D2D is shorther than 4D2D is much shorther than 4D
None, Female3.4%    8.5%    18.6%    32.2%    1.7%    
Left0.0%1.7%    1.7%    6.8%    0.0%
Right0.0%1.7%    0.0%6.8%    0.0%
Same0.0%0.0%1.7%    6.8%    0.0%




Correlation of 173: Leader / Follower Vs. 21: Finger Length Ratio 2D:4D

98 Responses:
 Finger Length Ratio 2D:4D
 
Leader / Follower
2D is much longer than 4D2D is longer than 4D2D is the same length as 4D2D is shorther than 4D2D is much shorther than 4D
Leader2.0%    14.3%    16.3%    31.6%    0.0%
Follower2.0%    5.1%    9.2%    14.3%    2.0%    


24 Responses from Males:
Finger Length Ratio 2D:4D
x Leader / Follower
2D is much longer than 4D2D is longer than 4D2D is the same length as 4D2D is shorther than 4D2D is much shorther than 4D
Leader0%8%    12%    54%    0%
Follower0%8%    0%16%    0%


74 Responses from Females:
Finger Length Ratio 2D:4D
x Leader / Follower
2D is much longer than 4D2D is longer than 4D2D is the same length as 4D2D is shorther than 4D2D is much shorther than 4D
Leader2%    16%    17%    24%    0%
Follower2%    4%    12%    13%    2%    




Correlation of 456: Prostate Gland - Enlarged Vs. 21: Finger Length Ratio 2D:4D
Finger ratio depends on sex hormones, and artificial exposure of femal sex hormones cam cause prostate cancer, so does prenatal androgen exposure affect later estrogen's tendancy to cause cancer in men?

51 Responses:
 Finger Length Ratio 2D:4D
 
Prostate Gland - Enlarged
2D is much longer than 4D2D is longer than 4D2D is the same length as 4D2D is shorther than 4D2D is much shorther than 4D
No, Female5.9%    7.8%    19.6%    35.3%    2.0%    
Never Checked0.0%0.0%2.0%    11.8%    0.0%
No, Checked-out OK0.0%2.0%    0.0%7.8%    0.0%
Yes, Slight Enlargement0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%
Yes, Moderate Enlargement0.0%0.0%0.0%3.9%    0.0%
Yes, Severe Enlargement0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%




Correlation of 195: Times Sick per Year Vs. 21: Finger Length Ratio 2D:4D

126 Responses:
 Finger Length Ratio 2D:4D
 
Times Sick per Year
2D is much longer than 4D2D is longer than 4D2D is the same length as 4D2D is shorther than 4D2D is much shorther than 4D
00.0%0.8%    0.8%    2.4%    0.0%
13.2%    2.4%    9.5%    8.7%    0.0%
20.0%7.1%    7.9%    16.7%    0.8%    
30.8%    3.2%    5.6%    4.8%    0.0%
40.0%2.4%    4.0%    2.4%    0.0%
50.0%1.6%    0.8%    4.8%    0.0%
6-100.0%1.6%    0.8%    3.2%    0.8%    
11-200.0%0.0%0.0%0.8%    0.8%    
21+0.0%0.0%0.0%1.6%    0.0%


30 Responses from Males:
Finger Length Ratio 2D:4D
x Times Sick per Year
2D is much longer than 4D2D is longer than 4D2D is the same length as 4D2D is shorther than 4D2D is much shorther than 4D
00%0%0%10%    0%
10%3%    3%    16%    0%
20%3%    10%    36%    0%
30%3%    0%3%    0%
40%3%    0%3%    0%
50%0%0%0%0%
6-100%0%0%3%    0%
11-200%0%0%0%0%
21+0%0%0%0%0%


96 Responses from Females:
Finger Length Ratio 2D:4D
x Times Sick per Year
2D is much longer than 4D2D is longer than 4D2D is the same length as 4D2D is shorther than 4D2D is much shorther than 4D
00%1%    1%    0%0%
14%    2%    11%    6%    0%
20%8%    7%    10%    1%    
31%    3%    7%    5%    0%
40%2%    5%    2%    0%
50%2%    1%    6%    0%
6-100%2%    1%    3%    1%    
11-200%0%0%1%    1%    
21+0%0%0%2%    0%




Correlation of 535: Birth Mass (Weight) Vs. 21: Finger Length Ratio 2D:4D

26 Responses:
 Finger Length Ratio 2D:4D
 
Birth Mass (Weight)
2D is much longer than 4D2D is longer than 4D2D is the same length as 4D2D is shorther than 4D2D is much shorther than 4D
100.0%0.0%0.0%3.8%    0.0%
500.0%0.0%0.0%3.8%    0.0%
850.0%0.0%3.8%    0.0%0.0%
880.0%0.0%3.8%    0.0%0.0%
910.0%0.0%0.0%3.8%    0.0%
960.0%3.8%    3.8%    0.0%0.0%
1030.0%0.0%0.0%3.8%    0.0%
1040.0%0.0%0.0%7.7%    0.0%
1110.0%0.0%0.0%3.8%    0.0%
1120.0%0.0%3.8%    7.7%    0.0%
1150.0%0.0%0.0%3.8%    0.0%
1200.0%3.8%    0.0%0.0%0.0%
1220.0%0.0%0.0%3.8%    0.0%
1270.0%0.0%0.0%3.8%    0.0%
1283.8%    3.8%    0.0%3.8%    0.0%
1300.0%0.0%0.0%3.8%    0.0%
1340.0%0.0%0.0%3.8%    0.0%




Correlation of 534: Gestational Period Vs. 21: Finger Length Ratio 2D:4D

26 Responses:
 Finger Length Ratio 2D:4D
 
Gestational Period
2D is much longer than 4D2D is longer than 4D2D is the same length as 4D2D is shorther than 4D2D is much shorther than 4D
00.0%3.8%    0.0%3.8%    0.0%
3.8%    0.0%3.8%    7.7%    0.0%
320.0%0.0%0.0%3.8%    0.0%
360.0%0.0%3.8%    0.0%0.0%
370.0%0.0%3.8%    3.8%    0.0%
380.0%3.8%    3.8%    0.0%0.0%
400.0%3.8%    3.8%    42.3%    0.0%
410.0%0.0%0.0%3.8%    0.0%




Correlation of 533: Gestational Period, Difference Vs. 21: Finger Length Ratio 2D:4D

27 Responses:
 Finger Length Ratio 2D:4D
 
Gestational Period, Difference
2D is much longer than 4D2D is longer than 4D2D is the same length as 4D2D is shorther than 4D2D is much shorther than 4D
-80.0%0.0%0.0%3.7%    0.0%
-40.0%0.0%3.7%    0.0%0.0%
-30.0%0.0%3.7%    0.0%0.0%
00.0%7.4%    3.7%    40.7%    0.0%
3.7%    0.0%7.4%    7.4%    0.0%
10.0%0.0%0.0%11.1%    0.0%
20.0%3.7%    0.0%0.0%0.0%
30.0%0.0%0.0%3.7%    0.0%

Site by Louy (LouisMarquette.com)       Other Sites by: EventLister.com / CraftLister.com 4thWayInfo.com HypnosisForGrowth.com ShotByCupid.com